explain.depesz.com

PostgreSQL's explain analyze made readable

Result: nNFU

Settings
# exclusive inclusive rows x rows loops node
1. 0.000 2,477.789 ↑ 1.3 76 1
→

Limit (cost=4,939.32..7,583.93 rows=100 width=386) (actual time=268.377..2,477.789 rows=76 loops=1)

2.          

Initplan (forLimit)
3. 0.035 0.175 ↑ 1,478,142.0 1 1
→

Nested Loop Anti Join (cost=0.28..942,815.73 rows=1,478,142 width=0) (actual time=0.175..0.175 rows=1 loops=1)

4. 0.023 0.023 ↑ 75,802.1 39 1
→

Seq Scan on deal_row (cost=0.00..76,837.83 rows=2,956,283 width=32) (actual time=0.020..0.023 rows=39 loops=1)

5. 0.117 0.117 ↑ 1.0 1 39
→

Index Only Scan using product_article_code_pk on product_article (cost=0.28..0.29 rows=1 width=9) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=1 loops=39)

  • Index Cond: (code = deal_row.code)
  • Heap Fetches: 38
6. 24.247 79.279 ↑ 1.0 1 1
→

Aggregate (cost=4,933.50..4,933.51 rows=1 width=32) (actual time=79.279..79.279 rows=1 loops=1)

7. 55.032 55.032 ↑ 1.1 173,574 1
→

Seq Scan on deal_customer deal_customer_1 (cost=0.00..4,439.98 rows=197,406 width=4) (actual time=0.013..55.032 rows=173,574 loops=1)

  • Filter: (customer_id IS NOT NULL)
  • Rows Removed by Filter: 24824
8. 0.353 2,477.747 ↑ 1,048.6 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4.90..2,107,631.30 rows=79,695 width=386) (actual time=268.376..2,477.747 rows=76 loops=1)

9. 0.118 2,477.242 ↑ 1,048.6 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4.46..1,763,366.23 rows=79,695 width=381) (actual time=268.196..2,477.242 rows=76 loops=1)

10. 0.361 2,476.896 ↑ 1,048.6 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4.03..1,197,436.44 rows=79,695 width=377) (actual time=268.193..2,476.896 rows=76 loops=1)

11. 0.417 2,475.699 ↑ 1,048.6 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=3.60..631,506.65 rows=79,695 width=373) (actual time=268.175..2,475.699 rows=76 loops=1)

12. 0.169 1,578.558 ↑ 209.7 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=2.15..410,750.06 rows=15,939 width=273) (actual time=0.236..1,578.558 rows=76 loops=1)

13. 0.151 1,578.237 ↑ 209.7 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=1.72..297,564.10 rows=15,939 width=269) (actual time=0.233..1,578.237 rows=76 loops=1)

14. 0.159 1,577.858 ↑ 209.7 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=1.29..228,711.09 rows=15,939 width=265) (actual time=0.229..1,577.858 rows=76 loops=1)

15. 0.138 1,575.799 ↑ 209.7 76 1
→

Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.85..159,858.07 rows=15,939 width=261) (actual time=0.195..1,575.799 rows=76 loops=1)

  • Join Filter: (unhandled_deals.deal_id = deal.id)
  • Rows Removed by Join Filter: 75
16. 86.025 1,575.585 ↑ 209.7 76 1
→

Nested Loop (cost=0.85..159,617.70 rows=15,939 width=257) (actual time=0.177..1,575.585 rows=76 loops=1)

17. 1,012.484 1,012.484 ↓ 7.4 119,269 1
→

Index Scan Backward using deal_pkey on deal (cost=0.43..99,796.70 rows=16,100 width=96) (actual time=0.077..1,012.484 rows=119,269 loops=1)

  • Filter: ((office_id = 8) OR ((type <> 'AGENT'::text) AND (sender_office_id = 8)) OR ((type <> 'AGENT'::text) AND (receiver_office_id = 8)))
  • Rows Removed by Filter: 963068
18. 477.076 477.076 ↓ 0.0 0 119,269
→

Index Scan using deal_state_pkey on deal_state (cost=0.43..3.72 rows=1 width=165) (actual time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=119,269)

  • Index Cond: (deal_id = deal.id)
  • Filter: ((last_status_state <> 'DONE'::text) AND (last_status_state <> 'DISCARDED'::text))
  • Rows Removed by Filter: 1
19. 0.061 0.076 ↑ 1.0 1 76
→

Materialize (cost=0.00..1.29 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=76)

20. 0.015 0.015 ↑ 1.0 1 1
→

Seq Scan on unhandled_deals (cost=0.00..1.29 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.014..0.015 rows=1 loops=1)

  • Filter: (office_id = 8)
  • Rows Removed by Filter: 22
21. 1.900 1.900 ↑ 2.0 1 76
→

Index Scan using deal_actions_deal_id_action_uindex on deal_actions action_offer_sent_table (cost=0.43..8.21 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=1 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: ((deal_id = deal.id) AND (action = 'OFFER_SENT'::text))
22. 0.228 0.228 ↓ 0.0 0 76
→

Index Scan using deal_actions_deal_id_action_uindex on deal_actions action_paid_table (cost=0.43..8.21 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=0 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: ((deal_id = deal.id) AND (action = 'PAID'::text))
23. 0.152 0.152 ↓ 0.0 0 76
→

Index Scan using deal_actions_deal_id_action_uindex on deal_actions action_buy_sent_table (cost=0.43..7.10 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: ((deal_id = deal.id) AND (action = 'BUY_SENT'::text))
24. 353.931 896.724 ↑ 5.0 1 76
→

Hash Right Join (cost=1.45..15.25 rows=5 width=104) (actual time=10.067..11.799 rows=1 loops=76)

  • Hash Cond: (list_customer_by_id.id = deal_customer.customer_id)
25. 541.425 541.425 ↓ 43.1 43,091 75
→

Function Scan on list_customer_by_id (cost=0.25..10.25 rows=1,000 width=68) (actual time=3.468..7.219 rows=43,091 loops=75)

26. 0.228 1.368 ↑ 1.0 1 76
→

Hash (cost=1.18..1.18 rows=1 width=40) (actual time=0.018..0.018 rows=1 loops=76)

  • Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 9kB
27. 1.140 1.140 ↑ 1.0 1 76
→

Index Scan using deal_customer_deal_id_ndx on deal_customer (cost=0.42..1.18 rows=1 width=40) (actual time=0.015..0.015 rows=1 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: (deal_id = deal.id)
28. 0.836 0.836 ↓ 0.0 0 76
→

Index Scan using deal_actions_deal_id_action_uindex on deal_actions action_buy_received_table (cost=0.43..7.10 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=0 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: ((deal_id = deal.id) AND (action = 'BUY_RECEIVED'::text))
29. 0.228 0.228 ↓ 0.0 0 76
→

Index Scan using deal_actions_deal_id_action_uindex on deal_actions action_sell_sent_table (cost=0.43..7.10 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=0 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: ((deal_id = deal.id) AND (action = 'SELL_SENT'::text))
30. 0.152 0.152 ↓ 0.0 0 76
→

Index Scan using deal_actions_deal_id_action_uindex on deal_actions action_sell_received_table (cost=0.43..8.21 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=0 loops=76)

  • Index Cond: ((deal_id = deal.id) AND (action = 'SELL_RECEIVED'::text))