explain.depesz.com

PostgreSQL's explain analyze made readable

Result: hwgW

Settings
# exclusive inclusive rows x rows loops node
1. 0.032 768.764 ↑ 252.5 24 1

Hash Left Join (cost=2,783.05..7,383.15 rows=6,061 width=3,976) (actual time=768.019..768.764 rows=24 loops=1)

  • Hash Cond: (nits.cod_actividad_economica = actividad_itau.cod_actividad_economica)
2. 0.058 768.518 ↑ 100.2 24 1

Hash Left Join (cost=2,762.71..7,145.87 rows=2,405 width=3,566) (actual time=767.793..768.518 rows=24 loops=1)

  • Hash Cond: ((nits.cod_segmento_gest)::text = textin(int2out(subsegmento_itau.cls_segmento)))
3. 0.023 768.431 ↑ 100.2 24 1

Hash Left Join (cost=2,760.81..7,121.13 rows=2,405 width=3,526) (actual time=767.750..768.431 rows=24 loops=1)

  • Hash Cond: (docdeu.codcob_ultimo = estcob.codcob)
4. 0.025 768.331 ↑ 100.2 24 1

Hash Left Join (cost=2,744.52..7,098.45 rows=2,405 width=3,498) (actual time=767.663..768.331 rows=24 loops=1)

  • Hash Cond: (nits.tipo_iden = tipo_documento_itau.tip_doc_id)
5. 0.039 768.281 ↑ 100.2 24 1

Hash Left Join (cost=2,742.71..7,090.19 rows=2,405 width=3,334) (actual time=767.629..768.281 rows=24 loops=1)

  • Hash Cond: ((docdeu.tipdoc)::text = (tipdoc.tipdoc)::text)
6. 0.041 768.169 ↑ 100.2 24 1

Nested Loop (cost=2,735.22..7,055.04 rows=2,405 width=3,372) (actual time=767.535..768.169 rows=24 loops=1)

7. 0.241 767.984 ↑ 100.2 24 1

Hash Right Join (cost=2,734.80..2,909.66 rows=2,405 width=3,236) (actual time=767.505..767.984 rows=24 loops=1)

  • Hash Cond: (sn.consdocdeu = docdeu.consdocdeu)
8. 0.305 0.305 ↑ 2.3 1,257 1

Seq Scan on segui_negociaciones sn (cost=0.00..167.40 rows=2,840 width=16) (actual time=0.018..0.305 rows=1,257 loops=1)

9. 0.155 767.438 ↑ 133.6 18 1

Hash (cost=2,704.74..2,704.74 rows=2,405 width=3,236) (actual time=767.437..767.438 rows=18 loops=1)

  • Buckets: 4096 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 48kB
10. 767.283 767.283 ↑ 133.6 18 1

Index Scan using docdeu_estado_idx on docdeu (cost=0.42..2,704.74 rows=2,405 width=3,236) (actual time=87.959..767.283 rows=18 loops=1)

  • Index Cond: (estado = 'A'::bpchar)
  • Filter: (meses_transcurridos_neg IS NOT NULL)
  • Rows Removed by Filter: 356692
11. 0.144 0.144 ↑ 1.0 1 24

Index Scan using nits_nit on nits (cost=0.42..1.72 rows=1 width=152) (actual time=0.006..0.006 rows=1 loops=24)

  • Index Cond: (nit = docdeu.nit)
12. 0.029 0.073 ↑ 1.0 155 1

Hash (cost=5.55..5.55 rows=155 width=38) (actual time=0.073..0.073 rows=155 loops=1)

  • Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 14kB
13. 0.044 0.044 ↑ 1.0 155 1

Seq Scan on tipdoc (cost=0.00..5.55 rows=155 width=38) (actual time=0.008..0.044 rows=155 loops=1)

14. 0.012 0.025 ↑ 1.0 36 1

Hash (cost=1.36..1.36 rows=36 width=184) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=36 loops=1)

  • Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 11kB
15. 0.013 0.013 ↑ 1.0 36 1

Seq Scan on tipo_documento_itau (cost=0.00..1.36 rows=36 width=184) (actual time=0.007..0.013 rows=36 loops=1)

16. 0.032 0.077 ↑ 2.3 139 1

Hash (cost=12.24..12.24 rows=324 width=36) (actual time=0.077..0.077 rows=139 loops=1)

  • Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 17kB
17. 0.045 0.045 ↑ 2.3 141 1

Seq Scan on estcob (cost=0.00..12.24 rows=324 width=36) (actual time=0.006..0.045 rows=141 loops=1)

18. 0.015 0.029 ↑ 1.0 40 1

Hash (cost=1.40..1.40 rows=40 width=166) (actual time=0.029..0.029 rows=40 loops=1)

  • Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 11kB
19. 0.014 0.014 ↑ 1.0 40 1

Seq Scan on subsegmento_itau (cost=0.00..1.40 rows=40 width=166) (actual time=0.007..0.014 rows=40 loops=1)

20. 0.106 0.214 ↑ 1.0 504 1

Hash (cost=14.04..14.04 rows=504 width=248) (actual time=0.214..0.214 rows=504 loops=1)

  • Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 58kB
21. 0.108 0.108 ↑ 1.0 504 1

Seq Scan on actividad_itau (cost=0.00..14.04 rows=504 width=248) (actual time=0.007..0.108 rows=504 loops=1)

Planning time : 1.606 ms
Execution time : 768.929 ms